Brit Award-winning singer Jorja Smith's record label has said it wants a share of the royalties for a song it claims was created using an artificial intelligence clone of the singer's voice. I Run by British dance act Haven went viral on TiKTok in October thanks, in part, to smooth soul vocals by an uncredited female singer. Although I Run has now been re-released with new vocals, Smith's label FAMM said it believes the track was made with AI trained on her work, and is seeking compensation. It's bigger than one artist or one song, FAMM wrote in a statement on Instagram . The label said it believes both versions of the track infringe on Jorja's rights and unfairly take advantage of the work of all the songwriters with whom she collaborates.

Psychedelic rock band The Velvet Sundown has over a million monthly listeners on Spotify and earns thousands of dollars every month. However, the catch is that it's not a traditional band at all. It's mostly made by artificial intelligence. Their Spotify bio confirms that the group is a synthetic music project, guided by human creative direction but composed, voiced, and visualized using AI. This is a sign of where music may be headed.

In their lawsuit, the entertainment giants called Midjourney's popular AI-powered image generator a "bottomless pit of plagiarism" for its alleged reproductions of the studios' best-known characters. The suit, filed in federal court in Los Angeles, claims Midjourney pirated the libraries of the two Hollywood studios, making and distributing without permission "innumerable" copies of their marquee characters such as Darth Vader from Star Wars, Elsa from Frozen, and the Minions from Despicable Me. Midjourney did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Horacio Gutierrez, Disney's chief legal officer, said in a statement: "We are bullish on the promise of AI technology and optimistic about how it can be used responsibly as a tool to further human creativity, but piracy is piracy, and the fact that it's done by an AI company does not make it any less infringing." NBCUniversal's executive vice-president and general counsel, Kim Harris, said the company was suing to "protect the hard work of all the artists whose work entertains and inspires us and the significant investment we make in our content". Instead, the studios argue, Midjourney continued to release new versions of its AI image service that boast higher-quality infringing images.

The lawsuits allege Udio produced output with "striking resemblances" to songs including Dancing Queen by ABBA and All I Want For Christmas Is You by Mariah Carey, while Suno allegedly turned out songs similar to I Got You (I Feel Good) by James Brown and Johnny B. Goode by Chuck Berry, among others. Record labels were able to basically recreate versions of very famous songs with highly specific prompts, then linked to them in the lawsuits. I made a short compilation here:https://t.co/9Nu7rW7eqD These lawsuits are not the first to trouble the booming generative AI industry. Visual artists have sued makers of image generating systems, while various newspapers are suing OpenAI, the owner of ChatGPT, for similar allegations.

AI companies have pillaged the internet for training data, and many websites and data set owners have started restricting the ability to scrape their websites. We've also seen a backlash against the AI sector's practice of indiscriminately scraping online data, in the form of users opting out of making their data available for training and lawsuits from artists, writers, and the New York Times, claiming that AI companies have taken their intellectual property without consent or compensation. My colleague James O'Donnell dissects the lawsuits in his story and points out that these lawsuits could determine the future of AI music. But this moment also sets an interesting precedent for all of generative AI development. Thanks to the scarcity of high-quality data and the immense pressure and demand to build even bigger and better models, we're in a rare moment where data owners actually have some leverage.

However, the stakes are higher for AI music than for image generators or chatbots. Generative AI companies working in text or photos have options to work around lawsuits; for example, they can cobble together open-source corpuses to train models. In contrast, music in the public domain is much more limited (and not exactly what most people want to listen to). Other AI companies can also more easily cut licensing deals with interested publishers and creators, of which there are many; but rights in music are far more concentrated than those in film, images, or text, industry experts say. They're largely managed by the three biggest record labels--the new plaintiffs--whose publishing arms collectively own more than 10 million songs and much of the music that has defined the last century.

The world's biggest record labels are suing two artificial intelligence startups, taking an aggressive stance to protect their intellectual property against technology that makes it easy for people to generate music based on existing songs. The Recording Industry Association of America said it filed twin lawsuits Monday against Suno AI and Uncharted Labs Inc., the developer of Udio AI, on behalf of Universal Music Group NV, Warner Music Group Corp. and Sony Music Entertainment. The RIAA, a trade group for record labels, is seeking damages of as much as 150,000 "per work infringed." That could amount to potentially billions of dollars. "The music community has embraced AI, and we are already partnering and collaborating with responsible developers to build sustainable AI tools centered on human creativity that put artists and songwriters in charge," Mitch Glazier, chief executive officer of the RIAA, said in a statement.

Supporters have compared machine learning by AI tools to the way humans learn by reading, hearing and seeing previous works. But in the complaints, which were filed in federal court in Massachusetts and New York, the record labels say the AI firms are simply making money from having copied the songs. The complaints say Suno and Udio produce works like "Prancing Queen" that even devoted ABBA fans would struggle to distinguish from an authentic recording from the band. Songs cited in the Udio lawsuit include Mariah Carey's "All I Want for Christmas is You" and "My Girl" by The Temptations. They said there was nothing about AI that excused the firms from "playing by the rules" and warned that the "wholesale theft" of the recordings threatened "the entire music ecosystem". The lawsuits come just months after roughly 200 artists including Billie Eilish and Nicki Minaj signed a letter calling for the "predatory" use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the music industry to be stopped.

Ricardo Santiago, director at Diamond Behavioral Health, tells Fox News Digital about the'One Week No Booze' trend and how it could impact relationship with alcohol. In a significant blow to TikTok, Universal Music Group (UMG) has initiated the removal of its extensive music catalog from the platform, impacting global superstars such as Taylor Swift, Drake and Olivia Rodrigo. This drastic action comes as a result of failed negotiations to renew the licensing agreement that allowed TikTok to feature music from some of the biggest names in the industry. TAYLOR SWIFT IS THE LATEST HIGH-PROFILE DEEPFAKE VICTIM. HERE'S WHAT LAWMAKERS ARE DOING TO PROTECT THEM The discord between the two giants centers on several critical issues, including financial compensation for artists and songwriters, the handling of AI-generated music, and measures to ensure online safety, safeguarding against hate speech, bigotry, bullying, and harassment.

Streaming may have killed off MP3s in the same way the iPod put paid to CDs and cassettes ended the dominance of vinyls. Each time the music industry has adapted and evolved. But what do record labels have up their sleeves to ward off the threat of artificial intelligence (AI)? Well, after the emergence of a string of'deepfake' songs where the likes of Johnny Cash, Frank Sinatra and Drake have had their voices convincingly mimicked, the world's largest record label is taking action. Universal Music is now in talks with Google to license artists' voices and melodies so they can be used for songs generated by AI.